Search This Blog

Showing posts with label India. Show all posts
Showing posts with label India. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Kalimohan was the only believer those days in Tagore's ideas of rural reconstruction

Rabindranath was an exceptionally well travelled man for his time, even by European or American standards. Along with that, he carried an unquenchable thirst to learn about the nature, flora, fauna and the fabric of humanity wherever he went. Having an analytical mind and being acutely conscious of the plight of the impoverished masses in India, he could not help but wonder what were good about the lands he visited, that could be either emulated, or modified, to suit the needs of India.
Rabindranath had written that, early in his life, (1) when living in a houseboat tied to the banks of the Padma river in today’s Bangladesh, he had thought that his life’s pursuit was going to be primarily writing poems and songs and a lifelong engagement with literary creation. Nothing else.
But then, he could not but notice the plight of the poor peasants, many of them subjects of his own family estate. He could not help analyze the issue and come to the conclusion, rightly, that true progress for nation cannot come without starting at the root, which means, uplifting the masses from their sorry state. Rabindranath did mention that observation to a noted national Politician of the time in Pabna Conference. However, the politician disregarded that observation as he did not think much about the poor masses. Rabindranath concluded that, the politician possibly imported the notion of “nationhood” from foreign sources, and did not harbor any fellow feeling with the rural populace, restricting his world to the tiny slice of middle class city dwellers.
Anyhow, Rabindranath reminisces  that while he did not consider himself qualified for any work other than literary, he changed his mind. When he could not convince anybody else at the time, that real work for independence starts with turning the villages of India into self sustainable healthy units, he decided to tuck his pen behind his ear, and engage himself to the task of toiling with the cultivators, the artisans and the stone cutters of the land, in an effort to find a path towards progress for the masses.
It came to him that the real ownership of and relationship with, agricultural land belonged to the poor cultivators, and not the land lord. He also wondered how samabaya samiti (collective cooperatives) could pool in resources in the villages and joining hands in cultivating larger plots of land collectively, rather than the small plots where each persons does what he can on his own slice. To this end, he found the experiments ongoing in Russia of great interest (1).
Rabindranath write that, in those days of early effort in his Zamindari estates in todays Bangladesh, his only real companion in this work was a teenage Kalimohan Ghosh. Feeble and sickly, Kalimohan often succumbed to fever twice a day. On top of that, his name was in the Police diaries, likely to be arrested some day for sedition, since he was involved with the Swadeshi, or freedom movement as a young boy (1).
Kalimohan genuinely believed in Rabindranath’s analysis of India’s weakness, where the social foundation was weak and rotting. Any work towards regeneration must first start with rebuilding a robust foundation, over which future generations can built monuments and building blocks for the nation.
Kalimohan was undernourished and overworked in hot and humid conditions day and night in the Muslim villages in and around the Tagore estates, often going without proper meal or sleep, and spending nights in sheds without proper beds, or protection from mosquito and bugs. He developed various skin, stomach and lung ailments along with malaria, and eventually a form of tuberculoses. That was when Tagore got worried that he the young dedicated social worker might not survive.
The fact that Rabindranath mentioned this repeatedly in his writings, remembering how lonely he was those days in his efforts to do something for the downtrodden villagers, where Kalimohan was the only true believer he had, goes to show the depth of Rabindranath’s feelings, not just for Kalimohan, but his convictions that any work towards progress for his moribund nation needed to include first and foremost improving the lot of its village dwellers and stopping them from exploitation.
Tagore’s serious effort to save him was the reason Kalimohan lived on for decades and had a children  including my mother, and indeed, the reason I myself am here, writing this blog.
But rechecking Tagore’s own writings on it, and connecting it with what my grandmother used to say, how Kalimohan was enfeebled in his work in the villages of the Tagore estate and his passionate involvement with Rabindranath’s ideas of rural reconstruction work, and how, desperate to save his life, Tagore eventually had to call an English doctor - an unheard of thing for rural folks those days, and had to send him off to a dry land to recuperate, I gradually came to the conclusion that this was a rather close call for a young Kalimohan Ghosh. He almost died at the wheel. In a strange way, I felt I owed my very existence to Rabindranath’s serious effort to save Kalimohan. Rabindranath, himself only in his thirties at the time, who thought he wanted to do nothing more than write poems and songs, but ended up, lonely and misunderstood by his peers, trying his best with the limited resources at his disposal to search for and experiment with means to firm up and rebuild the rickety and crumbling social foundation of the nation of India.
And I, sitting in relative comfort in Canada, literally owned my life to him.
I think, if I had said this to my mother, Sujata Mitra, perhaps the biggest fan of Kalimohan among his children, she would have been pleased.
I hope you are listening from up there, ma.
Tonu

1:  Russiar Chithi (Letters from Russia) #4

Friday, June 17, 2011

What can you read from media, about Corruption in India?

Anti-corruption drive and the hue and cry over the Jan Lokpal Bill across India might be snowballing into a mass movement like no other. The sheer uniqueness of it is attracting attention of the general masses. If this is going to be an agent of fundamental change to the way India attempts to Govern itself, is to be seen.

Meanwhile, I have been observing the news media on this topic with some interest, both within India and outside of it. And living far away from India as I do, I am also as aware as the next person, of the way various Governments, and organizations do things. And hence I, like many others in my position, might have developed a view point different from the mainstream either in India or outside.

I thought I shall jot some of my observations here:
Many electronic news articles both written and video, cover this story mainly analyzing humans involved in the anti-corruption protests, such as Anna Hazare, or Baba Ramdev, or about political parties and their jostling. Some also cover the senior leaders of the Government.

What is woefully lacking, is an analysis in depth, of the subject itself - corruption.

Let us see what one can find on the topic, today, the 17th of June 2011, on the internet.

  1. IBN Live : It says BJP has ceded ground to Anna Hazare on the anti-graft fight.
  2. Rediff - Retired Col Anil Athale made a good article, advising Anna and Baba to start a mass movement first and not a fast. The article was short, but I liked it. It shows how fast was successfully used towards smaller goals by Gandhi. But he did not fast for independence. He created a huge mass movement of awareness regarding colonialism. Likewise, the Baba and Mr. Hazare might consider working towards creating awareness across the nation in a real mass movement. As Mr. Athale says - there is no shortcut to revolution, even a peaceful non-violent one. I like this short article. It at least acknowledges a few things, albeit indirectly. These are : a) There is corruption that is so entrenched and deep-rooted that it need for something like a revolution, albeit a peaceful one, b) While it criticized the Baba and Hazare, the focus was about the method of protest rather than the credentials of the protesters. While I like the article, I would slightly disagree with Mr. Athale. Yes, fasting in itself will not remove corruption, and yes, there is a need for mass movement and raising of mass awareness. But, I feel, unlike Gandhi’s time when he had to travel the length and breadth of India and slowly build a mass movement, today, internet and the media has the ability of spreading the word equally effectively and widely. I further believe that this is happening right now. One could argue if Hazare and the rest might concentrate more on the mass movement and less on the fast etc - but in general, it is my perception that there is a mass movement initiating, albeit sans Gandhi and without the need, at this point of time, to have any identifiable leader. Corruption itself is proving to be an unifying issue to bring in disparate groups together. Anyhow, Col Athale offers a fresh point of view. Good show.
  3. The Guardian, a British paper has an article by Jayati Ghosh called “Why are the Indians suddenly angry about corruption?”.  I liked it. She analyzes the issue of corruption itself, and also analyzes the strange behavior of the Government in dealing with it. The behavior, she says may be indication that: a0 Many of the senior members of the ruling leaders are deeply involved in corruption and are stashing black money abroad, or b) India’s recent growth itself is based on corrupt practices, designed to enhance the elite class and further disenfranchise the poor.
  4. The Hindu has an article analyzing Anna Hazare instead of corruption and the link between money, elected officials, bureaucracy, judiciary and the state law enforcement apparatus.
  5. The Deccan Herald has an article named “Confronting Corruption”. The article says that the blight of corruption has started prejudicing the common people against democracy itself and that is a dangerous trend. Overall, I consider this article to be balanced and of high value. There are several good points raised here. The basics are as follows: a) India’s story of democracy is generally good rather than bad, if compared with how it worked with majority of nations that got independence after WWII. b) Considering the diversity of the people, the alternative to democracy might be fragmentation. c) Civil society is within its rights to ask for stringent anti-corruption laws. A few high politicians swiftly tried and if guilty given a fitting punishment would likely deter future politicians or bureaucrats. But, China often does that - execute corrupt officials. And yet, on world ranking, China and India rank close to each other, both way way behind the least corrupt nations. This means, deterrence alone is not enough - a multitude of factors must help each other in reducing corruption. The article believes that that is happening, and slowly but surely, corruption will be on the wane. But meanwhile, civil society is in its rights to ask for stricter rules.
  6. BBC has a headline - Indian activist will resume fast. BBC has fallen a lot in recent years, and now verges on the border of being reporter of trivia.
  7. Times of India’s article headline asks - Will Rajani(kant) join Anna Hazare? Not worth reading.
  8. Money Life’s article : Arrogance of power is killing democracy. Amen
  9. Kolkata Telegraph has an article criticizing Anna Hazare’s team in asking for powers beyond constitution. The article seems to totally ignore the issue of corruption, and focuses primarily on Anna teams power grabbing. Like most mainstream, the Kolkata Telegraph is by and large a trivia bottom feeder.
  10.  The Economic Times has an article covering Kiran Bedi speaking at the Chicago council of Global Affairs, on the issue of Corruption. She identifies the loss of revenue to India through corruption to be about US$ 16 per year. I like her focus on the issue.
  11.  Times of India covers Mayavati slamming Congress for corruption. Another trivia feeder. The Indian Express joins Times of India, quoting Mayavati who called Congress the mother of graft. The Hindu too picked up on it.
  12.  NDTV shows an elderly Murali Manohar Joshi of BJP (I think) accusing the Govt of India of corruption. What else is new?
  13.  Wall Street Journal in the US has a different and expected angle - that India lacks a conservative base. The article headline calls it Conservative Vacuum. Wall Street Journal, in its wisdom, believes being right wing republican pro corporate anti people is the solution to everything in life, from rising sea level to saving the tiger.

Well, I could go on with a hundred more - but you get the picture. The mainstream news media promotes trivia, even relating to the anti-corruption drive. The mainstream seems to thrive on trivializing anything and everything. But there are good analysis outside of main stream. And foreign articles are as varied as the Indian ones.

The root issue, corruption, has caught attention. The solution is by no means going to be easy, or quick, or simple. Mass movement would be needed, and some feel that is happening now. Middle class is unlikely to sustain it by themselves - but the poor are coming forward to join. The elite in India are unqualified to fix this problem, and they will not fix it. The politicians are largely corrupt, along with many in the bureaucracy. So, changes for the better is not going to be initiated by them either. Therefore, a civil society that can pull in the poorest of the poor may be needed.
The fourth pillar - independent press - leaves a lot to be desired, especially the main stream. But then that is the case all over the world.

Saturday, June 11, 2011

My take on the anti corruption drive

This movement in India has come out of nowwhere and has overtaken cricket, bollywood, and Delhi politics all at the same time. Folks whose name I never heard before - Anna Hazare, Baba Ramdev, etc - have gotten to national and international limelight and staying there. This mass movement has spanned vast stretches of the heartland, across cities and towns, across provinces and regions. It has attracted, perhaps again for the first time - people from the urban middle class as well as the rural poor.

This is a phenomenon in the making. The corruption raj is endemic and deep rooted. Its eradication is not going to happen in a day. But, somehow, I feel this movement has crossed a silent thresold.

Anyhow, I had watched the growth of this movement on Facebook - a networking platform on the internet. And I posted something on their Facebook page, which I thought I might repeat here :

QUOTE
I believe this movement has been breathtaking - like a fresh breeze over polluted and stagnant airs of Indian politics. It is something I had never quite seen before in this magnitude. It is very very welcome, and about time.

However, it is my feeling that the benefit of this movement is not going to be an immediate eradication of all corruption in a month, or two, or even a few years. This would take a rather long time and a hard struggle. I shall explain why.
First, let us not forget that endemic corruption is not just present in India, but is a Global phenomenon. Only in India it has resulted in this movement. This bodes rather well for the Indian people.

But, on the other hand - think of the challenges the civil society faces. The people it has to deal with to bring in change and stop corruption - the elected members of the Government, the Judiciary, and the Bureaucracy - they are the main beneficiaries of the corruption, by and large. So, you are not going to find it easy for them to bring in new Lokpal bill, and implement it, that is designed to put them out of business.

IN democracy, the biggest and the only non-violent weapon that the public has, is the vote. Eventually, this movement has to mature so that voters stop thinking in narrow compartmentalized groupings of regionalism, linguistic ethnic or faith differences, and vote blindly in their narrow slots. They would need to keep an additional item in their checklist, which takes priority over other distinctions - and that it - which candidate allows corruption to continue, and which one is willing to go against his/her own party leader, and vote for REAL CHANGE to the system. My suspicion is that brand name politicians and people with long tenure into the system are likely already corrupt, or become complacent and the fight has gone out of them. One would need a new breed of elected members of high moral to come up to serve the nation.

This movement has a very vital function though - to raise awareness about how deep the decease goes - how pervasive and all encompassing it is - and how it crosses party and ideological borders.

This is also a movement where, perhaps for the first time, the middle class and the disenfranchised are finding common ground. This is a ground breaking development.
The face of India’s political landscape is changing. Perhaps India is destined to show the world a new say of Governance.
Jai Hind.
UNQUOTE

The original link to the post is at : http://www.facebook.com/IndiACor#!/photo.php?fbid=224865794209780&set=a.186653318031028.51064.165845033445190&type=1&theater

Meanwhile, I wrote a poem about the movement, and in my own mother tongue (Bengali). I thought I might as well put that up here too.

Cheers.

Friday, June 3, 2011

A nation without history




As a kid, I was not fond of history. But then, if I think back at the text of the history books those days, it was perhaps to be expected. The history books were boring, and basically comprised of dates when rulers ascended the throne, won or lost wars, or kicked the bucket. Life apparently did not have mentionable events those days, except for rulers coming and going.






But, it should not have been like that. Life was most certainly not drab, without dynamism and air brushed in a uniform shade of gray.




And today, while I read history of items that take my fancy, I realize how little there is to read, about the history of India, of Bengal, and of our past, in language and format that makes it interesting not only to learn, but to debate and discuss.




Take the life and times of Kalidasa, one of the greatest literary genius of the Sanskrit era. What was it like to live in those times, both in cities and serve the king’s court, or to live in the forest and collect honey ? How did the economy work ? What were the social movements shaping up? Was the divide between the Hindu and Muslims already deep ? Was there even a recognizable divide ?




Or, let us say the events leading to the discovery of Harappa and Mahenjodaro by Rakhaldas Bannerjee. Who was the monk that lead Bannerjee in 1922 to the site. Why did he (the monk) suspect that it was a Budhhist Stupa. What else did Rakhaladas Bannerjee discover ? How did the discovery of Mohenjodaro play out in the next few years with the traditional understanding of Indian history ?




Or, how about the arrival of the French at the Bay of Bengal. There are references in records of frenchmen (ref : Three Frenchmen in Bengal/ The Commercial Ruin of the French Settlements in 1757). According to records kept by these gentlemen, the French established a presence, a French version of the East India Company, separate from the Dutch and the English versions, in the 1660s, and Emperor Aurangzeb ceded, or handed over, the territory around todays Chandannagar, near the river Hoogly, to France as early as 1688. I wonder why the indian part of the deed and the deal is not a subject well known in Bengal and why this is not a topic of discussion that I can see on the paper or see on the TV, even on a history channel. What prompted Aurangzeb to hand over Candannagar to France ? How did he dare do that without the knowledge or involvement of anybody living in or around the place ? What did Aurangzeb get in return ?




I wish questions like these are debated, discussed and analyzed, so we can have as much grasp on our own history, where we came from and how. It might help us get a better grip on our own past, and perhaps help us conceptualize the future. Any case, it is information that appears relevant enough to have merited national attention at some level.




I find it easier to dig history of other nations, but not of our own. Why not ?




History of Hinduism




Take the way Hinduism evolved and sprouted a multiplicity of Gods. That wasn’t how it started. The evolution of the faith based practices themselves have historical links, and discussing these would help place the so called faith or religion in its proper perspective. Look at it this way - Hindu is not even a word coined by folks practicing the so called religion. Its a name given by Persians and most likely was related to a river, which is no more in India, rather than any religion. Look at it another way - there are folks vegetarian, because they claim they are Hindu. Then there are folks that eat meat, because they claim they are Hindu. There are a huge number of folks that do not eat beef, because they are Hindu. There are also folks that do eat beef, because they claim they are Hindu. There were old sages in mythology, that readily ate everything, including horses and beef, and they were the pioneers that created Hinduism as we know it today.




So …. The evolution of religious practices, and how much of these practices have anything to do with religion per se, and how much local custom of the time and place that is made to appear as if it is linked to religion - are subjects that should have been part of history and part of a social discourse and study.